Publication:
Determining the One Repetition Maximum in the Ballistic Bench Press Exercise

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Publication date

Reading date

Event date

Start date of the public exhibition period

End date of the public exhibition period

Authors

Loturco, Irineu
McGuigan, Michael R.
Suchomel, Timothy
Freitas, Tomás T.
Pereira, Lucas A.

Advisors

Authors of photography

Person who provides the photography

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

National Strength and Conditioning Association
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative load (% of one repetition maximum [1RM]) at which the concentric action becomes entirely propulsive in the bench press (BP) exercise and verify whether this relative load varies between athletes with different strength levels. Twenty-eight professional athletes (Olympic boxers, professional mixed martial arts fighters, and elite rugby players) performed a progressive loading test up to their 1RM in the BP exercise (BP-1RM). Athletes were ordered according to their relative strength values and equally divided into 2 different groups: “low” (≤1.34) and “high” (≥1.38) strength levels. An independent t-test was used to compare the variables between groups. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. No significant differences were observed between the groups for the mean propulsive velocity attained at 1RM and for the maximum load that required braking action during the execution of the traditional BP exercise (effect size = 0.27 and 0.15, respectively; p > 0.05). Our results revealed that at 80% 1RM the concentric action can already be considered as 100% propulsive in the BP exercise. Importantly, this occurrence was independent of strength level. Therefore, this relative strength measure (i.e., 80% BP-1RM) may be used as a reference for the 1RM in the BP throw.

Doctoral program

Related publication

Research projects

Description

Bibliographic reference

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 34(12):p 3321-3325

Photography rights