Publication:
Comparison of load-velocity relationships in two bench press variations: weight stack machine vs smith machine

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Publication date

Reading date

Event date

Start date of the public exhibition period

End date of the public exhibition period

Advisors

Authors of photography

Person who provides the photography

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Performing the bench-press (BP) exercise in a weight stack machine (WSM) is a common practice. However, no previous studies have analysed the load-velocity relationship in this BP variant. The purpose of this study was 1) to investigate the load-velocity relationship during BP exercise using a WSM; and 2) to compare the load-velocity relationship in this exercise in two conditions: WSM vs. Smith machine (SM). Twenty-six young men performed a BP progressive loading test to determine their one-repetition maximum and load-velocity relationship using a WSM. Additionally, 19 participants performed two progressive loading tests (WSM and SM). A high relationship was found between the relative load (%1RM) and mean propulsive velocity (MPV) (R2 = 0.97; SEE = 0.07 m/s) in the WSM. Moreover, significant differences were observed (p <.05) in the MPV values attained in every %1RM in WSM and SM from 30 to 75% 1RM. The close relationship between the MPV values and the %1RM in BP exercise using a WSM enables coaches to use the MPV to accurately monitor their athletes on a daily basis. The differences observed between WSM and SM in the %1RM and their respective MPVs indicate that different equations must be used for each exercise mode.

Doctoral program

Related publication

Research projects

Description

Bibliographic reference

Rodiles-Guerrero, L., Pareja-Blanco, F., & León-Prados, J. A. (2020). Comparison of load-velocity relationships in two bench press variations: weight stack machine vs Smith machine. Sports Biomechanics, 21(10), 1147–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1735499

Photography rights