Publication: The co-existence of multiple oak leaf flushes contributes to the large within-tree variation in chemistry, insect attack and pathogen infection
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Reading date
Event date
Start date of the public exhibition period
End date of the public exhibition period
Authors
Gaytán, Á.
Moreira, X.
Castagneyrol, B.
Van Halder, I.
De Frenne, P.
Meeussen, C
Timmermans, B.G.H.
Ten Hoopen, J.P.J.G.
Rasmussen, P.U.
Bos, N.
Advisors
Authors of photography
Person who provides the photography
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Abstract
Many plant species produce multiple leaf flushes during the growing season, which might
have major consequences for within-plant variation in chemistry and species interactions. Yet,
we lack a theoretical or empirical framework for how differences among leaf flushes might
shape variation in damage by insects and diseases.
We assessed the impact of leaf flush identity on leaf chemistry, insect attack and pathogen
infection on the pedunculate oak Quercus robur by sampling leaves from each leaf flush in 20
populations across seven European countries during an entire growing season.
The first leaf flush had higher levels of primary compounds, and lower levels of secondary
compounds, than the second flush, whereas plant chemistry was highly variable in the third
flush. Insect attack decreased from the first to the third flush, whereas infection by oak powdery
mildew was lowest on leaves from the first flush. The relationship between plant chemistry,
insect attack and pathogen infection varied strongly among leaf flushes and seasons.
Our findings demonstrate the importance of considering differences among leaf flushes for
our understanding of within-tree variation in chemistry, insect attack and disease levels,
something particularly relevant given the expected increase in the number of leaf flushes with
climate change.
Doctoral program
Related publication
Research projects
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/757833/EU
Description
Bibliographic reference
New Phytologist, 235 (4): 1615-1628




