Publication:
Are CO2 Emissions Stationary After All? New Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Publication date

Reading date

Event date

Start date of the public exhibition period

End date of the public exhibition period

Advisors

Authors of photography

Person who provides the photography

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This study applies a large battery of state-of-the-art nonlinear unit root tests to examine the stationarity properties of carbon dioxide emission series for 28 industrialized countries, five BRICS and seven transition economies over a very long horizon, in some cases over more than two and a half centuries. The application of time-dependent and state-dependent nonlinear unit root tests separately provides mixed evidence regarding the time-series properties of CO2 emissions and a high degree of variability across the different tests. However, the use of hybrid nonlinear unit root tests, combining the presence of structural breaks with symmetric or asymmetric ESTAR adjustment, leads to the rejection of the unit root hypothesis in each of the countries under study with at least one of the hybrid tests. This has important climate policy implications.

Doctoral program

Related publication

Research projects

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/ECO2017-86780-R/ES/PROPUESTAS DE MEJORA PARA LA ECONOMIA ESPAÑOLA: DESEMPLEO, EMPAREJAMIENTO LABORAL, REGULACION LABORAL, EFICIENCIA INSTITUCIONAL, CAPITAL SOCIAL Y CRECIMIENTO/

Description

This study applies a large battery of state-of-the-art nonlinear unit root tests to examine the stationarity properties of carbon dioxide emission series for 28 industrialized countries, five BRICS and seven transition economies over a very long horizon, in some cases over more than two and a half centuries. The application of time-dependent and state-dependent nonlinear unit root tests separately provides mixed evidence regarding the time-series properties of CO2 emissions and a high degree of variability across the different tests. However, the use of hybrid nonlinear unit root tests, combining the presence of structural breaks with symmetric or asymmetric ESTAR adjustment, leads to the rejection of the unit root hypothesis in each of the countries under study with at least one of the hybrid tests. This has important climate policy implications.
Proyectos de investigación Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [grant number ECO2017-86780-R, AEI/FEDER, UE] Junta de Andalucía [grants number I+D+i project P20_00808, PAIDI SEJ-513]
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-022-09835-4
https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/28212 https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/journal-policies

Bibliographic reference

Environmental Modeling & Assessment, Volume 27, pages 621–643, (2022).

Photography rights