RT Journal Article
T1 Comparison of 10% vs. 30% Velocity Loss during Squat Training with Low Loads on Strength and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Soccer Players
A1 Rojas-Jaramillo, Andrés
A1 León-Sánchez, Gustavo
A1 Calvo Lluch, África
A1 González-Badillo, Juan José
A1 Rodríguez Rosell, David
K1 Velocity-based resistance training
K1 Kicking ball speed; Jump performance
K1 Training volume
K1 High-speed actions
K1 Training specificity
AB Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two velocity-based resistance training (RT) programs using moderate loads (45–60% 1RM) but different magnitudes of velocity loss (VL) limits (10% vs. 30%) on the changes in physical performance in young soccer players. Twenty young soccer players were randomly allocated into two groups: VL10% (n = 10) and VL30% (n = 10). All participants were assessed before and after the 8-week RT program (twice a week) involving the Citation: Rojas-Jaramillo, A.; León-Sánchez, G.; Calvo-Lluch, Á.; González-Badillo, J.J.; RodríguezRosell, D. Comparison of 10% vs. 30% Velocity Loss during Squat Training with Low Loads on Strength and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Soccer Players. Sports 2024, 12, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/ sports12020043 Academic Editor: Corrado Lupo Received: 21 November 2023 Revised: 30 December 2023 Accepted: 5 January 2024 Published: 30 January 2024 Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). following tests: 20 m running sprint (T20), countermovement jump (CMJ), kicking a ball (KB), and progressive loading test in the full squat (SQ) exercise. The RT program was conducted using only the SQ exercise and movement velocity was monitored in all repetitions. Significant ‘time × group’ interaction (p < 0.05) was observed for sprint performance, KB and 1RM in the SQ exercise in favor of VL10%. Nosignificant changes between groups at post-test were observed. The VL10% resulted in significant (p < 0.05–0.001) intra-group changes in all variables analyzed, except for KB, whereas VL30% only showed significant (p < 0.05) performance increments in a sprint test and 1RM in the SQexercise. The percentage of change and the intra-group’s effect size were of greater magnitude for VL10% in all variables analyzed compared to VL30%. In conclusion, our results suggest that, for non-trained young soccer players, squat training with low to moderate relative loads and 10%VL is sufficient to elicit significant increases in muscle strength and sport-specific actions compared to 30%VLin the set.
PB MDPI
YR 2024
FD 2024-01-30
LK https://hdl.handle.net/10433/22499
UL https://hdl.handle.net/10433/22499
LA en
NO Rojas-Jaramillo, A., León-Sánchez, G., Calvo-Lluch, Á., González-Badillo, J. J., & Rodríguez-Rosell, D. (2024). Comparison of 10% vs. 30% Velocity Loss during Squat Training with Low Loads on Strength and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Soccer Players. Sports, 12(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12020043
NO Departamento Deporte e Informática. Universidad Pablo de Olavide
DS RIO
RD May 1, 2026