Publication:
Validity and Concordance of a Linear Position Transducer (Vitruve) for Measuring Movement Velocity during Resistance Training

dc.contributor.authorGonzález Galán, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Bermudo, José Carlos
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Badillo, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Rosell, David
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T10:54:39Z
dc.date.available2025-11-18T10:54:39Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to analyze the intra-device agreement of a new linear position transducer (Vitruve, VT) and the inter-device agreement with a previously validated linear velocity transducer (T-Force System, TF) in different range of velocities. A group of 50 healthy, physically active men performed a progressive loading test during a bench press (BP) and full-squat (SQ) exercise with a simultaneous recording of two VT and one TF devices. The mean propulsive velocity (MPV) and peak of velocity (PV) were recorded for subsequent analysis. A set of statistics was used to determine the degree of agreement (Intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient [CCC], mean square deviation [MSD], and variance of the difference between measurements [VMD]) and the error magnitude (standard error of measurement [SEM], smallest detectable change [SDC], and maximum errors [ME]) between devices. The established velocity ranges were as follows: >1.20 m·s−1; 1.20–0.95 m·s−1; 0.95–0.70 m·s−1; 0.70–0.45 m·s−1; ≤0.45 m·s−1 for BP; and >1.50 m·s−1; 1.50–1.25 m·s−1; 1.25–1.00 m·s−1; 1.00–0.75 m·s−1; and ≤0.75 m·s−1 for SQ. For the MPV, the VT system showed high intra- and inter-device agreement and moderate error magnitude with pooled data in both exercises. However, the level of agreement decreased (ICC: 0.790–0.996; CCC: 0.663–0.992) and the error increased (ME: 2.8–13.4% 1RM; SEM: 0.035–0.01 m·s−1) as the velocity range increased. For the PV, the magnitude of error was very high in both exercises. In conclusion, our results suggest that the VT system should only be used at MPVs below 0.45 m·s−1 for BP and 0.75 m·s−1 for SQ in order to obtain an accurate and reliable measurement, preferably using the MPV variable instead of the PV. Therefore, it appears that the VT system may not be appropriate for objectively monitoring resistance training and assessing strength performance along the entire spectrum of load-velocity curve.
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartamento: Deporte e Informática
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationSensors 2024, 24(19), 6444
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s24196444
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10433/25067
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectValidity
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectVelocity-based resistance training
dc.subjectLinear position transducer
dc.subjectMeasurement
dc.titleValidity and Concordance of a Linear Position Transducer (Vitruve) for Measuring Movement Velocity during Resistance Training
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd70908dd-a22a-4190-b802-0754d54d5c1b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication598cba53-2df8-448e-8450-46057a19ee8c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd70908dd-a22a-4190-b802-0754d54d5c1b

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sensors-24-06444.pdf
Size:
285.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format