Publication:
Valuing the Option to Purchase an Asset at a Proportional Discount: A Correction

dc.contributor.authorF. Navas, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T11:44:21Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T11:44:21Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-01
dc.description.abstractGu (2002) introduces proportional-strike options to study a residential real estate program in China. Under this program, a state employee can buy her house at a fraction of the market price. The employee can also qualify for a subsidized mortgage. Given that the homeowner has the option, but not the obligation, of taking the subsidy, we show that the solution of the housing problem derived by Gu can be wrong. We provide a numerical example to illustrate the point.
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartamento de Economía Financiera y Contabilidad
dc.identifier.citationThe Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 720-724 (2009)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.qref.2007.10.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10433/21684
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectOption pricing
dc.subjectProportional-strike options
dc.subjectEmployee compensation package
dc.titleValuing the Option to Purchase an Asset at a Proportional Discount: A Correction
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8b3329ec-f336-4095-8d5f-68fe7420e546
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3329ec-f336-4095-8d5f-68fe7420e546

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Navas_QREF_2009.pdf
Size:
94.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format