Publication:
Primary closure of the midline abdominal wall defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: analysis of risk factors for failure and outcomes at 5 years follow‑up

dc.contributor.authorGómez-Menchero, Julio
dc.contributor.authorBalla, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorF. Carazo, Ana
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Conde, Salvador
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-17T12:56:24Z
dc.date.available2025-01-17T12:56:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-26
dc.description.abstractBackground The primary aim of this prospective study is to report bulging and recurrence rates and to analyze the risk factors responsible for failure, after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) with primary closure of defect (PCD) using a running suture and intraperitoneal mesh placement, at 5-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate 30-day postoperative complications, seroma, and pain. Methods PCD failure was defined as the presence of postoperative bulging and/or recurrence. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). After surgery, fifty-eight patients underwent clinical examination and computed tomography scan to diagnose bulging, recurrence, and seroma (classified according to the Morales-Conde classification). Results At 60 months follow-up, recurrence was observed in five patients (8.6%), while bulging, not needing a surgical treatment, occurred in fifteen patients (25.9%). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the only risk factor responsible for both outcomes together, bulging and recurrences (p = 0.029), while other considered risk factors as gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, smoke habits, primary or incisional hernia and the ratio defect width/transverse abdominal axis did not achieve the statistically significance. Clinical seroma was diagnosed at one month in eight patients (13.8%). Seromas were observed at one year of follow-up. During the follow-up, pain reduction occurred. Conclusion LVHR has evolved toward more anatomical concepts, with the current trend being the abdominal wall anatomical reconstruction to improve its functionality, reducing seroma rates. Based on results obtained, PCD is a reliable technique with excellent recurrence rate at 5 years follow-up, even when the defect closure may generate tension at the midline. On the other hand, this tension could be related with high bulging rate at long-term, particular in case of patients with COPD.
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad Pablo de Olavide. Departamento de Economía, Métodos Cuantitativos e Historia Económica.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationGómez-Menchero J, Balla A, Fernández Carazo A, Morales-Conde S. Primary closure of the midline abdominal wall defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: analysis of risk factors for failure and outcomes at 5 years follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9064-9071. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09374-9. Epub 2022 Jun 21. PMID: 35729405.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-022-09374-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10433/22431
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subjectPrimary closure of defect (PCD)
dc.subjectLaparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR)
dc.subjectIntraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus
dc.subjectBulging
dc.subjectRecurrence
dc.subjectAcceso solo a metadatos
dc.titlePrimary closure of the midline abdominal wall defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: analysis of risk factors for failure and outcomes at 5 years follow‑up
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd0c9496c-8c59-4abc-b9fb-330b2a969c78
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd0c9496c-8c59-4abc-b9fb-330b2a969c78

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SurgicalEndoscopy_2022.pdf
Size:
518.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format