Publication:
Gender affinity effects between female voters and women leaders in parliamentary elections: Cross-national evidence (1996-2016)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Publication date

Reading date

Event date

Start date of the public exhibition period

End date of the public exhibition period

Authors

Ortega Villodres, Carmen
Oñate Rubalcaba, Pablo

Advisors

Authors of photography

Person who provides the photography

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

SAGE
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

An increasing amount of literature has demonstrated that party leaders affect voting behavior in parliamentary elections. However, the electoral impact of female leadership of political parties has been under-researched. The gender affinity hypothesis suggests that when women run for presidential or prime ministerial office, women are more likely than men to vote for them. Using data from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems project, we tested gender affinity effects between female voters and female party leaders in mixed-sex legislative elections, that is, elections involving at least one female party candidate for prime minister, in parliamentary and semi-presidential systems. We analyzed 50 elections held from 1996 to 2016 in 24 countries. The results showed that female leaders were better evaluated by women and that women were more likely than men to vote for them. However, the gender affinity effects were small and not largely conditioned or not conditioned at all by other factors, such as some voters’ characteristics and electoral setting.

Doctoral program

Related publication

Research projects

Description

This study was supported by the Operational Program: Andalusia ERDF 2014-2020: B-SEJ-508-UGR18 and Research Program AICO2023.

Bibliographic reference

Ortega, C., Recuero, F., & Oñate, P. (2025). Gender affinity effects between female voters and women leaders in parliamentary elections: Cross-national evidence (1996-2016). Party Politics, 31(2), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231221124

Photography rights