Publication:
Anthropometric traits and physical performance of amateur rugby players within specific playing positions

dc.contributor.authorZabaloy, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorAlcaraz, Pedro E.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Lucas A.
dc.contributor.authorGiráldez, Julián
dc.contributor.authorGálvez González, Javier
dc.contributor.authorLoturco, Irineu
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Tomás T.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T13:46:35Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T13:46:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-19
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the differences in physical and anthropometric traits between specific playing positions (i.e., forwards: front row, second row, back row; backs: half backs, centers, wings/fullbacks) in amateur rugby players and analyzed the magnitude of correlations among jump, sprint, and strength measures in forwards and backs. METHOD: Sixty-four male rugby players were assessed in anthropometrics, a variety of vertical jumps, 10- and 30-m sprint, and strength tests (i.e., squat and bench press). RESULTS: Front row forwards (FFR) demonstrated significantly higher body mass (BM) than second row (FSR) and back row (FBR) (107.4 ± 12.8, 99.1 ± 9.9 and 91.6 ± 7.6 kg respectively; p< 0.001). FFR showed greater absolute strength in bench press and squat, although no differences were found in relative strength. Regarding the differences in jump performance, FBR and FSR showed significantly (p< 0.05) and significant to non-significant (p= 0.042–0.078, ES = 0.90–1.55) higher jumps in all tasks compared to FFR. Moreover, FBR demonstrated lower sprint times and greater maximum sprinting speed (MSS) than FFR (p< 0.01). For the backs, centers (BCEN) were significantly heavier (p< 0.05) and exhibited a non-significantly moderate larger sprint momentum (p= 0.068, ES = 0.75) compared to half backs (BHB). MSS values were small to moderately greater in favor of wings/fullbacks [BWFB] (p= 0.188–0.059, ES = 0.50–0.71). Finally, statistically significant correlations were found between drop jump (flight time) and jump height across all jump tasks, sprint times and speed for both forwards (r= 0.541 to 0.996, p< 0.001) and backs (r= 0.422 to 0.995, p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, FFR demonstrated significant, small to very large differences, when compared to their specific peers, whereas the backs were more similar. Additionally, our results indicated moderate to strong associations between explosive tasks such as sprinting and jumping in both playing positions.
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartamento de Deporte e Informática. Universidad Pablo de Olavide.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationZabaloy S, Alcaraz PE, Pereira LA, et al. Anthropometric traits and physical performance of amateur rugby players within specific playing positions. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 2021;29(4):429-441. doi:10.3233/IES-210137
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/IES-210137
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10433/22485
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Journals
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectPhysical performance
dc.subjectRugby union
dc.subjectTesting
dc.subjectTraining
dc.titleAnthropometric traits and physical performance of amateur rugby players within specific playing positions
dc.title.alternativeRasgos antropométricos y rendimiento físico de jugadores de rugby amateur en posiciones de juego específicas
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf5c4f6f8-4dfe-4355-9c20-06dad86ec71c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf5c4f6f8-4dfe-4355-9c20-06dad86ec71c

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
zabaloy y galvez 2021 Isokintec rugby specific positions accepted.pdf
Size:
672.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format