Publication:
Effects of Different Loading Conditions During Resisted Sprint Training on Sprint Performance

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Rosell, David
dc.contributor.authorSáez de Villarreal Sáez, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorMora Custodio, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorAsián Clemente, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBachero-Mena, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorLoturco, Irineu
dc.contributor.authorPareja Blanco, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-19T11:48:50Z
dc.date.available2025-11-19T11:48:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of 5 loading conditions (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80% of body mass [BM]) during weighted sled sprint training on unresisted and resisted sprint performance and jump ability. Sixty physically active men were randomly assigned into 5 groups according to the overload used during sled sprint training: 0% (G0%, n = 12), 20% (G20%, n = 12), 40% (G40%, n = 12), 60% (G60%, n = 12), and 80% BM (G80%, n = 12). Pretraining and post-training assessments included: countermovement jump (CMJ), 30-m sprint without extra load, and 20-m sprint with 20, 40, 60, and 80% BM. All 5 experimental groups trained once a week for a period of 8 weeks completing the same training program (number of sessions, number of bouts, running distance in each sprint, rest intervals between repetitions, and total running distance), but with different sled loads (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80% BM). There was a significant “time × group” interaction for resisted sprint performance at 80% BM condition, where the G40% group attained improvements in performance and G80% worsened. Moreover, G40% increased performance in unresisted and the rest of loading conditions. In addition, G0% and G60% showed statistically significant increases in unresisted sprint performance. No relevant changes were observed in the other experimental groups. All groups showed significant improvements (p < 0.05–0.001) in CMJ height. Therefore, our findings suggest that resisted sprint training with moderate loads (i.e., 40% BM) may have a positive effect on unresisted and resisted sprint performance.
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartamento: Deporte e Informática
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research 36(10):p 2725-2732
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000003898
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10433/25078
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNational Strength and Conditioning Association
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subjectWeighted sled towing
dc.subjectRunning sprint
dc.subjectJump ability
dc.subjectForce-velocity curve
dc.subjectAcceleration capacity
dc.titleEffects of Different Loading Conditions During Resisted Sprint Training on Sprint Performance
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication598cba53-2df8-448e-8450-46057a19ee8c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6f99c3d2-0e85-4d43-96c6-a3c6676b88b4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication68bd38cc-088b-4562-9d2f-469270ea9f97
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1e099657-86bf-46c3-8060-83f012908396
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8be1d68d-6a2c-49fd-b4a7-10efba0342e9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery598cba53-2df8-448e-8450-46057a19ee8c

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
effects_of_different_loading_conditions_during.8.pdf
Size:
502.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format