Publication:
Concurrent Training Followed by Detraining: Does the Resistance Training Intensity Matter?

dc.contributor.authorSousa, António C.
dc.contributor.authorMarinho, Daniel A.
dc.contributor.authorGil, Maria H.
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo, Mikel
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Rosell, David
dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Henrique P.
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Mário C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-19T11:52:13Z
dc.date.available2025-11-19T11:52:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to analyze the training and detraining (DT) effects of concurrent aerobic training and resistance training against 3 different external loads on strength and aerobic variables. Thirty-two men were randomly assigned to 4 groups: low-load (LLG, n = 9), moderate-load (MLG, n = 9), high-load (HLG, n = 8), and control group (CG, n = 6). Resistance training consisted of full squat (FS) with a low load (40–55% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), a moderate load (55–70% 1RM), or a high load (70–85% 1RM) combined with jump and sprint exercises. Aerobic training was performed at 75% of the maximal aerobic speed for 15–20 minutes. The training period lasted for 8-week, followed by 4-week DT. Pretraining, post-training, and post-DT evaluations included 20-m running sprints (0–10 m: T10; 0–20 m: T20), shuttle run test, countermovement vertical jump (CMJ) test, and loading test (1RM) in FS. All the experimental groups showed improvements (p ≤ 0.05) in all the parameters assessed, except the LLG for T10 and the HLG for T20. The LLG, MLG, and HLG showed great changes in 1RM and V̇o2max compared with the CG (p ≤ 0.05), whereas the HLG and MLG showed a greater percentage change than the CG in T10 (p < 0.001) and CMJ (p ≤ 0.05). The 4-week DT period resulted in detrimental effects in all variables analyzed for all 3 experimental groups. In conclusion, our results suggest that strength training programs with low, moderate, or high external loads combined with low-intensity aerobic training could be effective for producing significant gains in strength and aerobic capacities. Moreover, the higher loads used increased gains in explosive efforts.
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartamento: Deporte e Informática
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research 32(3):p 632-642
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000002237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10433/25079
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNational Strength and Conditioning Association
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subjectEndurance training
dc.subjectWeight training
dc.subjectLoad magnitude
dc.subjectSprint performance
dc.subjectJump performance
dc.subjectFull squat training
dc.titleConcurrent Training Followed by Detraining: Does the Resistance Training Intensity Matter?
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication598cba53-2df8-448e-8450-46057a19ee8c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery598cba53-2df8-448e-8450-46057a19ee8c

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
concurrent_training_followed_by_detraining__does.7.pdf
Size:
319.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format